Reductive strength

comments ( 2 )
December 16, 2011  posted by Bruce Zoecklein

The mystery of why some wines live and some wines die young should haunt every serious New World winemakerRandall Grahm Bonny Doon Vineyards

As discussed in previous postings, longevity may be considered within the pantheon of wine quality. The reductive strength of a wine is a measure of oxygen uptake and the ability to handle that uptake, that is improve with age. In red wines this is influenced principally by phenols and impacted by several winemaking protocols.

In a recent study (Kassas and Kennedy 2011) wines commanding the highest market value had several attributes in common including the highest concentrations of total tannins, the highest concentration of skin tannins and tannin-anthocyanin bound pigment polymers.

In grapes and wines, anthocyanin pigments can be either free monomers, that is, unbound, or associated with other compounds including phenols such as tannins to form polymers.

Tannin polymerization in fruit and wine continues until an anthocyanin molecule binds the terminal ends of the tannin chain forming  ‘bookends’, thus stopping the polymerization.  As such, the ratio of anthocyanins to tannins is important.  This ratio impacts the extent of polymerization and, therefore, astringency.  

Large tannin-tannin and tannin-anthocyanin polymers provide a relatively large number of binding sites to interact with proteins, as well as salivary proteins. As such, wines with an abundance of large polymers tend to lack softness and often possess a dry mouth sensation.

Conversely, smaller polymers have fewer protein binding sites and produce less astringency while providing a softer mouthfeel and often more palate depth. These smaller polymers are associated with enhanced reductive strength and wine aging potential.  

Some phenols (diphenols) have the ability to react with oxygen, bind with another phenol, and recreate the original structure-thus allowing it to react over and over again. This helps explain the rather counter intuitive feature of exposing a young wine to oxygen and making that wine more resistant to oxidation. Young red wines can consume oxygen, actually increasing reductive strength.

Randall Grahm of Bonny Doon Vineyards in California considers reductive strength to be analogous to a wine’s chi or, as the Chinese say, life force. When a wine is young, it can share its chi with the world; when old, it must guard it so the wine does not diminish too quickly. Young wines have a capacity to adsorb oxygen and that can actually increase its resistance to later oxidation. Irrespective of chi, we believe that reductive strength is related to the phenolic composition of a wine and, therefore, to longevity.

Experience is the name everyone give to the their mistakes- Oscar Wilde

Dr Bruce Zoecklein is a Professor Emeritus, Enology-Grape Chemistry Group Virginia Tech.

His Enology Notes are available at www.vtwines.info.


Flash Gordon in hot water after colour extraction incident at winery!

comments ( 0 )
August 26, 2011  posted by Bernard Mocke

If the title of this blog caught your eye, my ploy worked. Please accept my apologies; Flash Gordon will not be featured here. Or any other superheroes, for that matter. I will however elaborate on Flash Détente and its super colour-extraction abilities.

Of late, growing interest in colour extraction (especially in California) has led to the evolution of thermovinification into Flash-Détente. During thermovinification, the temperature of crushed red grapes is raised to 60˚C for anything from one to 24 hours. Thermophiles (pardon the pun) claim that increased tannin and colour extraction is to be had with thermovinification. The logic behind this is sound, as the high temperature breaks down cell structures. This in turn releases pigments, tannins and volatile compounds in the absence of ethanol. In the absence of alcohol, chemical bonds are formed between anthocyanin pigments and other phenols which stabilizes colour in the resulting wine. Should this concept give you cold feet, you might want to opt for cold soaking. During cold soaking, crushed grapes are soaked in their own chilly juices and pumped over for a few days in an effort to extract more colour.

Not impressed yet? Enter Flash-Détente, which is basically thermovinification on steroids. Grapes are briefly (two to five minutes) heated to 85˚C and then cooled in a vacuum. Cell walls pop, juices fly and a myriad of aroma and colour compounds are released. The vaporised water (with volatile compounds trapped within) is then chilled in a condensing column, after which the winemaker is left with the decision of adding the fluid fraction back to the main tank or not. Seeing that this condensate is full of pyrazines and in the case of lower quality grapes, rot and mold aroma compounds, the winemaker usually discards the condensate. This is however a double- edged sword, as varietal and fruity aromas is also lost in the condensate. Then again, the heat application inhibits enzymes such as polyphenol oxidase and laccase, which are often present in lower quality grapes. The effect of this heat on Brettanomyces is still ambiguous. Other benefits of extracting colour earlier are; improvement of purple hues in wine, fermentation at lower temperature and usage of different yeast strains. It is also speculated that the softer and rounder tannins are better extracted with water and heat, while the harsher tannins might be brought out where ethanol is the solvent.

Many traditional winemakers believe that Flash-Détente is for higher yield facilities, where often quantity outweighs quality (sic). It has been said that the loss of varietal character often results in a one-dimensional, soulless wine. As with all other winemaking decisions, the decision to go with or without thermovinification is an important one. Current studies on thermovinification are focusing on changing tannin concentrations in must with an increase in temperature and how varietal character is affected.

With a price-tag of $2 million for a Flash-Détente set-up, winemaker experience will be key in the decision to employ this system or not. Like they say, talk is cheap.

Bernard Mocke is a technical consultant for Oenobrands.


Think pink!

comments ( 3 )
May 7, 2010  posted by Karien O'Kennedy

Now I bet very few of you have given this any thought. After all a rosé and a blanc de noir is a “white wine” made from red grapes. So you use your normal settling enzyme. However, this “white wine” contains a certain amount of anthocyanin, which means this anthocyanin should preferably remain a stable colour to ensure the longevity of the wine. In plain English, the wine should preferably remain pink or onion skin, whatever our style is, for a year or longer. It should not turn slightly brownish. In the absence of tannin from the grapes, or ellagic tannin from wood, or oxygen from micro-oxygenation, how does one stabilise this colour? Well for one; keep stuff that can de-stabilise it in the first place away from it. 

 Anthocyanin, like I said in a previous blog, is stabilised by sugar molecules. When the sugar molecules are removed the colour becomes unstable and can lose it red tinge and become, well, less red. I am not a specialist on polyphenols and bless the souls of the people who are because I find the topic extremely complicated. I have tried and tried to fully comprehend the colour / tannin chemistry in wine and I am not sure if it is lack of intelligence or sheer boredom with the topic that makes it impossible for me to fully grasp it.  Anyway having gotten that of my chest, lets stick to the very simple model of anthocyanin and its sugar molecules.

 Settling enzymes (white wine enzymes) can contain a side activity, formed by the fungus during production, called glycosidase. This activity is also known as “anthocyanase.” It removes sugar molecules from more complex structures. Although very positive for white wine aroma, it can also potentially remove the sugar molecules from anthocyanin. Now granted, you need a certain concentration to have an effect and some settling enzymes may not contain high enough amounts to cause any damage to your colour. It is nonetheless a good idea to clear this matter with your enzyme supplier to make sure that there will be no effect on your rosé colour.  There are quality and composition differences between suppliers and it is a good idea to be aware of these differences. To make absolutely sure that you don’t have this activity in the enzyme you use for settling, use a red wine skin contact enzyme, where the supplier specifies: anthocyanase free, for settling of your rosé or blanc de noir juice. Skin contact enzymes contain the basic ingredients of settling enzymes as well as added side activities needed for skin pectin breakdown. So, it is a very effective settling enzyme as well, more expensive, due to the added activities, but very effective.


Is it okay to use my normal settling enzyme for red wine maceration?

comments ( 2 )
February 3, 2010  posted by Karien O'Kennedy
This is a question I got from a winemaker a few days ago. Some people selling enzymes will say yes, that any pectinase preparation you use will be better than using nothing at all. I suppose that can be the case. However, here are a few facts to consider when choosing an enzyme for red colour/tannin extraction.
 
Colour and tannin are mostly situated in red grape skins. The pectin structure of grape skins is much more complicated than the simple structure of the pulp. When your aim is settling only, you work with the pulp of the grape. A simple pectin structure only requires the basic pectinase activities of pectin lyase, pectin methyl esterase and polygalacturonase. That is why settling enzymes are the most cost effective to produce and usually the cheapest of an enzyme supplier’s range of enzymes.
 
If skin contact is your aim, you need additional enzymatic activities to break down the highly branched, complex pectin structure of skins. So in addition to the basic pectinases, skin contact enzymes contain various “side” activities. The production organism – Aspergillus niger – produces much less of these side activities than the basic pectinases. That is why production of skin contact enzymes is more expensive and you, the end user, has to fork out more. It is a specialised enzyme for a specialised application. So basically skin contact enzymes contain all the components of a settling enzyme, usually in higher concentrations, as well as specific side activities that will work on the more complex pectin structure of skins.
 
So, common sense will tell you that an enzyme specifically recommended for skin contact will therefore be way more efficient in extracting colour and tannin than a normal settling enzyme. But wait…there is more….if you order now, you get this beautiful set of steak knives absolutely free!!! OK I digress; seriously there is one more factor to keep in mind.
 
Aspergillus niger also produces a group of enzymes called glycosidases during the commercial production of pectinases. It actually falls under the group of side activities formed. It does it automatically, with some strains producing more than other. Glycosidases remove sugar molecules from more complex structures. In grapes, certain potentially flavour active compounds are bound to sugar molecules. In this bound form they are not flavour active. When the sugars are removed, you can smell and taste these compounds. An example is monoterpenes found in most white grape varieties, especially Riesling and Muscats. They are also found in red grapes. However, red wine colour, anthocyanin, is stabilised by sugar molecules. So by removing the sugars from anthocyanins, glycosidases can destabilise them, making your red wine colour, unstable. So what is a positive in white is a negative in red. Red wine enzymes should preferably not contain any glycosidases, or, as they are more commonly known in this case – anthocyanases.
 
My advice to you would thus be: make sure that the enzyme preparation you plan to use for red must maceration contain negligible levels of anthocyanase. If your supplier cannot give you that assurance, then switch to a supplier that can give you that assurance. No point in being penny wise and pound foolish. There are ways enzyme companies can manipulate production of red skin contact enzymes to minimise this activity. They generally, however, do not try to limit this activity in white enzymes, such as settling enzymes, since it is a positive for white wine aroma.
 
Having given you the scientific facts, my personal answer to the above question would be: no, it is not OK to use your settling enzyme for red skin contact. However, if your supplier can guarantee you that the anthocyanase activity in their settling enzyme is negligible, then I suppose some pectinase activity is better than none.