Why an alternative to bentonite might help save the world…

comments ( 0 )
August 12, 2011  posted by Bernard Mocke

Nowadays, going green is all the rage. People are driving electric cars, industrial carbon dioxide emissions are scrutinised and even flatulent cows are not escaping the wrath of greenies. So what does this have to do with the wine industry?

I’ve recently learned that bentonite is a big culprit, leading to wine losses equivalent to that of New Zealand’s annual white wine production. This loss of 1-3% represents 120,000-360,000 tonnes of grapes. The related liberation of greenhouse gases for irrigation, harvesting, pressing and processing of this amount of grapes was estimated at 36,000-225,000 tonnes of carbon dioxide per year. Unfortunately for mother nature, bentonite fining is an effective and simple method for the removal of haze-forming proteins.

Apart from wine that is trapped and lost in bentonite lees (up to 3%, even with subsequent rotary drum vacuum filtration-RDV), a considerable reduction in varietal character is also inadvertently effected when bentonite fining is done. It is well known that aroma and flavour molecules in wine can be adsorbed by bentonite, which in turn leads to an unwanted decline in wine quality. Further oxidation during recovery from the bentonite lees merely adds to the aforementioned decline.

Before you go on a witch-hunt and banish bentonite from your cellar, there is good news. It was found that in-line dosing in conjunction with RDV can significantly decrease wine losses. A short description of in-line dosing: Untreated wine is pumped from a storage tank to an injection point, where bentonite slurry (supplied from a slurry tank) is continuously injected into wine or juice. A static mixer disperses the slurry, ensuring even contact between wine and bentonite. A contact period of five minutes in pipe work is allowed before centrifugation is used to separate wine and bentonite. The problem with in-line dosing is that it is not yet widely used and installation can be costly.

Batch fining combined with RDV remains the most popular method in countries such as France, Italy, Spain, California (ostensibly a country), Australia, Germany, South Africa and New Zealand. Collectively, their white wine production represent 40% of all wine produced globally. The amount of bentonite required for protein stability varies according to a number of factors, such as year, fruit type and growing region. The report that I studied in Grapegrower and Winemaker Magazine (in preparation for writing this blog) indicated that with all factors taken into account, a dose of one gram of bentonite per litre of white wine will be assumed.

Let’s have a look at some more numbers relating to the use of bentonite in the above mentioned countries. They produced 80% of all white wine in 2008/2009 and revenue loss was more than US$820 000 per year. If the value of domestically sold wine is added to the export values of white wine, the aforementioned figure climbs to a staggering US$1 billion!

The scourge of pollution is slowly suffocating earth and with an estimated 80-250 million kWh energy requirement annually, we can’t afford not to research alternatives to bentonite fining. Keep watching this space!

Bernard Mocke is a technical consultant for Oenobrands


The devil you know

comments ( 0 )
August 27, 2010  posted by Louis Nel

We are taught the benefits of protein stabilization of wines, and accept it as fact. We believe because we are told to. Then sometimes along our wine journey, a suspicion creeps in, we have never seen this “haze” formed by protein instability, is this just another Father Christmas story, one that cannot be true? Like any religion, winemaking has stages, and one sometimes does some church hopping to find the right way of doing things.

When I was a young bright-eyed winemaker, straight out of university, I got excited whenever I met a well-known winemaker. They were my rock stars, and I wanted to be one. What makes them so special, what can I learn, what wisdom can I glean from their fertile minds? I would seek the answer, and go to the mountain and climb it, to find my guru.

At this time I met some of the most decadent rock stars, who told me that adding too much bentonite is just plain evil. It is a conspiracy of the bentonite magnates, who have underground meetings and want to sell tons of the stuff to the masses (this bit I just made up). Bentonite just strips wine, and should be used in very conservative amounts. The recipe the gods gave me was, whatever the lab says, add half of it. If the bentonite requirement was 80g/hℓ, add only 40g/hℓ. I came down from the mountain, and applied this wisdom for a very short while, because I finally found the haze that my lecturers taught me about. Luckily it was a very small run, and did not mean the financial ruin of my boss, but from then on I was a much safer winemaker. I was cured from following gurus for a long time.

There are lots of things that we are taught that we just accept as fact. Most of them are too dangerous to try and disprove, so we might never know the truth. At the other end of the spectrum there are people who get away with bad winemaking practices, because they have a cool cellar, have wine that is not prone to pinking, have a naturally low bacteria count in their wines, have naturally low Brett counts and other blessings. The impact of moving to another cellar where things are not the same as at home, can, however, be disillusioning.

Count your blessings, because you do not know, what it is you don’t know.

Louis Nel is the owner and winemaker of Louis wines in South Africa.